Evaluation of community-based strategies for Aedes aegypti control inside houses

Clara Beatriz Ocampo, Camila González, Carlos A. Morales, Mauricio Pérez, Dawn Wesson, Charles S. Apperson, .

Keywords: Aedes aegypti, vector control, Bacillus thuringiensis, dengue, consumer participation

Abstract


Introduction: Dengue viruses transmitted principally by the urban mosquito Aedes aegypti, cause one of the major public health problems confronting tropical cities. Insecticide spraying has been the mainstay of mosquito control; however, its continuous use has selected for resistance. Other important methods of control involve community participation.
Objective: This study evaluated two control methods for Ae. aegypti that can be used by the community: Lethal ovitraps (LOs) and Bacillus thuringiensis var israeliensis (Bti) briquettes.
Materials and methods: The project study was carried out in four similar neighborhoods within a representative district in the city of Cali, Colombia. Three interventions (LO, Bti, LO+Bti plus education and one control (education only) area were evaluated for efficacy in post-intervention entomological surveys. Additionally, entomological indices were also compared to results from a pre-intervention survey carried out on a sample of city blocks in the same neighborhoods. Relative vector abundance in relation to weather conditions using the same entomological sampling methods was compared.
Results: The interventions did not achieve significant differences in vector abundance among the treatments. However, the interventions achieved a significant reduction in entomological indices compared with those observed during the pre-intervention survey: House index 15.1% vs. 8.5%, mean pupae per house 1.15 vs. 0.073, and Adult index 56.3% vs. 34.8% (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The lack of significant differences among the interventions, and between treated and control blocks suggested that educational activities together with periodic visits to the houses produced similar reductions of immature and adult Aedes aegypti.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Clara Beatriz Ocampo Unidad de Entomología Médica, Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia
  • Camila González Unidad de Entomología Médica, Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia
  • Carlos A. Morales Área de Salud Ambiental-Programa Dengue, Secretaría de Salud Pública Municipal, Cali, Colombia
  • Mauricio Pérez Unidad de Entomología Médica, Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia
  • Dawn Wesson Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Charles S. Apperson Medical and Veterinary Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

References

1. Spiegel J, Bennett S, Hattersley L, et al. Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social-ecological approach. EcoHealth. 2005;2:273-90.
2. Guha-Sapir D, Schimmer B. Dengue fever: new paradigms for a changing epidemiology. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2005;2:1.
3. Gubler DJ. The changing epidemiology of yellow fever and dengue, 1900 to 2003: full circle? Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;27:319-30.
4. Gubler DJ. Resurgent vector-borne diseases as a global health problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:442-50.
5. Guzman MG, Kouri G. Dengue: an update. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:33-42.
6. Christopher RS. Aedes aegypti (L.), the yellow fever mosquito; its life history, bionomics and structure. London: Cambridge Univ. Press; 1960.
7. Morrison AC, Costero A, Edman JD, Clark GG, Scott TW. Increased fecundity of Aedes aegypti fed human blood before release in a mark-recapture study in Puerto Rico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999;15:98-104.
8. Perich MJ, Davila G, Turner A, Garcia A, Nelson M. Behavior of resting Aedes aegypti (Culicidae: Diptera) and its relation to ultra-low volume adulticide efficacy in Panama City, Panama. J Med Entomol. 2000;37:541-6.
9. Focks DA, Chadee DD. Pupal survey: an epidemiologically significant surveillance method for Aedes aegypti: an example using data from Trinidad. Am. J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56:159-67.
10. Gubler DJ, Clark GG. Dengue/Dengue Hemorraghic Fever. The emergence of a global health problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1:55-7
11. Gubler D. The emergence of epidemic dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever in the Americas: a case of failed public health policy. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2005;17:221-4.
12. Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Prevención y control del dengue. Boletín epidemiológico, semana 42. Sivigila, Ministerio de Salud, Colombia. Nov 2001; 2001.
13. Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Comportamiento por regiones del dengue en el 2000. Boletín epidemiológico nacional, semana 2. Sivigila, Ministerio de Salud, Colombia; 2002:2.
14. Suárez-Rubio M, Suárez M. The use of copepod Mesocyclops longisetus as a biological control agent for Aedes aegypti in Cali, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;20:401-4.
15. Suarez MF, Gonzales R, Morales CA. Themephos resistance to Aedes aegypti in Cali, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;55(Suppl.):257.
16. Hernandez VC, Segura I, Wesson DM, Ocampo CB. Insecticide resistance dynamics in Aedes aegypti from Cali, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61(Suppl.):436.
17. Ocampo CB, Wesson DM. Population dynamics of Aedes aegypti from dengue hyper-endemic urban setting in Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:506-13.
18. Zeichner BC, Perich MJ. Laboratory testing of a lethal ovitrap for Aedes aegypti. Med Vet Entomol. 1999;13:234-8.
19. Perich MJ, Kardec A, Braga IA, Portal IF, Burge R, Zeichner BC. Field evaluation of the lethal ovitrap against dengue vectors in Brazil. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:205-10.
20. Sulaiman S, Jeffery J, Sohadi AR, Yunus H, Busparani V, Majid R. Evaluation of Bactimos wettable powder, granules and briquets against mosquito larvae in Malaysia. Acta Tropica. 1990;47:189 -95.
21. WHO. Environmental Health Criteria, No 217: Bacillus thuringiensis; 1999.
22. Reiter P, Amador MA, Colon N. Enhancement of the CDC ovitrap with hay infusions for daily monitoring of Aedes aegypti populations. Am J Mosq Control Assoc. 1991;7:52-5.
23. Sithiprasasna R, Mahapibul P, Noigamol C, et al. Field evaluation of a lethal ovitrap for the control of Aedes aegypti (Culicidae) in Thailand. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:455-62.
24. Giraldo-Calderon G, Pérez M, Morales CA, Ocampo CB. Evaluación del triflumurón y la mezcla de Bacillus thuringiensis más Bacillus sphaericus para el control de las formas inmaduras de Aedes aegypti y Culex quinquefasciatus en sumideros de Cali, Colombia. Biomédica 2008;28:224-33.
25. Reiter P, Amador MA, Anderson RA, Clark GG. Short report: dispersal of Aedes aegypti in an urban area after blood feeding as demonstrated by rubidium-marked eggs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52:177-9.
26. Russell R, Webb C, Williams C, SA R. Mark-release-recapture study to measure dispersal of the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Cairns, Queensland, Australia. Med Vet Entomol. 2005;19:451-7.
27. Honorio NA, Silva WdC, Goncalves JM, Lounibos LP, Lourenco-de-Oliveira R. Dispersal of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in an urban endemic dengue area in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2003;98:191-8.
28. Focks DA, Brenner RJ, Hayes J, Daniels E. Transmission thresholds for dengue in terms of Aedes aegypti pupae per person with discussion of their utility in source reduction efforts. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62:11-8.
How to Cite
1.
Ocampo CB, González C, Morales CA, Pérez M, Wesson D, Apperson CS. Evaluation of community-based strategies for Aedes aegypti control inside houses. Biomed. [Internet]. 2009 Jun. 1 [cited 2026 Jan. 13];29(2):282-97. Available from: https://revistabiomedicaorg.biteca.online/index.php/biomedica/article/view/30

Some similar items:

Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo
Escanea para compartir
QR Code