Ten years of the immunogenetics laboratory performance assessment programme and its impact on the donor and transplant network

español, Español español, Español Español, Español Español, .

Keywords: transplantation immunology, organ transplantation, quality control, laboratory proficiency testing, immunogenetics, immunologic tests

Abstract

Introduction. The use of immunological tests before solid organ transplantation is essential to reduce the risk of rejection and post-transplant complications. Therefore, quality control systems in laboratories performing them are necessary for clinical practice. The Colombian Instituto Nacional de Salud implemented the external evaluation program of transplant immunogenetics laboratory performance in 2014.
Objective. To evaluate the performance of the laboratories that carried out five of the immunological tests for transplants in Colombia between 2014 and 2023, according to information from the external evaluation program of transplant immunogenetics laboratory performance.
Materials and methods. We conducted a study of laboratory performance considering five immunological tests for transplantation: HLA, qualitative and quantitative PRA (Panel Reactive Antibodies), isolated antigen, and cross-matching tests. We collected data from reports of each laboratory. Based on the comparisons between laboratories, their performance was rated as “good”, “acceptable”, or “unacceptable” for each test. We calculated proportions and an analysis of predicted values with a 95% confidence interval.
Results. The number of participating laboratories varied between 5 and 12, depending on the test. The proportion of laboratories with “good” performance was lower in the first year. The best performance was for qualitative PRA, rated as good in all the laboratories for eight years. In HLA (2014), qualitative PRA (2017 and 2019), crossmatch tests (2019), and single antigen (2017 and 2019) tests, the laboratories had a lower percentage of “good” performance than expected.
Conclusion. “Good” performance was observed in all the laboratories in each test during the last three years, except for HLA and quantitative PRA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Prieto L, Salinas MA, Arias YR, Rodríguez LM, Giraldo MC, Suárez DM, et al. Estándares de calidad para laboratorios que realizan pruebas de inmunogenética para trasplante de órganos. 2013. Fecha de consulta: 24 de febrero de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ins.gov.co/Direcciones/RedesSaludPublica/GestiondeCalidadLaboratorios/ConsultaEstandaresparaLaboratoriosdeInmunologia/Estandares%20para%20laboratorios%20de%20inmunologia%20version%20online%202013.pdf

The American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Quality assurance and standards. Fecha de consulta: 24 de febrero de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ashi-hla.org/page/standards

European Federation for Immunogenetics. Standards for histocompatibility immunogenetics. Fecha de consulta: 24 de febrero de 2024. Disponible en: https://efi-web.org/fileadmin/Efi_web/Standardv8_280819.pdf

McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276-82.

Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 8430 del 4 de octubre de 1993. Fecha de consulta: 30 de mayo de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.pdf

Zhao X, Ma S, Wang B, Jiang X, The Han100K Initiative, Xu S. PGG.MHC: Toward understanding the diversity of major histocompatibility complexes in human populations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D1102-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac997

Apps R, Qi Y, Carlson JM, Chen H, Gao X, Thomas R, et al. Influence of HLA-C expression level on HIV control. Science. 2013;340:87-91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232685

Díaz-Peña R, Castro-Santos P, Aransay AM, Brüges-Armas J, Pimentel-Santos FM, López-Larrea C. Genetic study confirms association of HLA-DPA1*01:03 subtype with ankylosing spondylitis in HLA-B27-positive populations. Hum Immunol. 2013;74:764-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2013.02.001

Migliorini F, Torsiello E, Spiezia F, Oliva F, Tingart M, Maffulli N. Association between HLA genotypes and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and progression: A comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00563-1

Zeestraten ECM, Reimers MS, Saadatmand S, Goossens-Beumer IJ, Dekker JWT, Liefers GJ, et al. Combined analysis of HLA class I, HLA-E and HLA-G predicts prognosis in colon cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:459-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.696.

Montgomery RA, Tatapudi VS, Leffell MS, Zachary AA. HLA in transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:558-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0039-x

Arias-Murillo YR, Salinas-Nova Ma, Montaño Ji. Criterios de asignación para trasplante renal en Colombia. Fecha de consulta: 12 de junio de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ins.gov.co/BibliotecaDigital/consenso-criterios-asignacion-trasplante-renal-colombia.pdf

Salinas-Nova MA, Arias-Murillo YR, Patiño-Amaya YA, Rivera T, Jiménez-Urrea V, Pineda-Lozano JC, et al. Conferencia de consenso de recomendaciones para la construcción de un documento nacional de criterios de asignación para trasplante de corazón en Colombia. Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2022. Fecha de consulta: 12 de junio de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ins.gov.co/BibliotecaDigital/consenso-criterios-de-asignacion-para-trasplantecardiaco-en-colombia.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Salud. Conferencia de consenso de criterios de asignación para trasplante de pulmón en Colombia. 2022. Fecha de consulta: 12 de junio de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ins.gov.co/BibliotecaDigital/resultados-consenso-de-pulmon.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Salud. Informe ejecutivo Red de Donación y Trasplantes 2023. Fecha de consulta: 12 de junio de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ins.gov.co/BibliotecaDigital/informe-ejecutivo-colombia-2023-anual.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Salud. Inscripción a los programas de evaluación externa del desempeño (PEED). Fecha de consulta: 12 de junio de 2024. Disponible en: https://www.ins.gov.co/TyS/programas-de-calidad

Levering WH, van den Beemd R, Marvelde JG, van Beers WA, Hooijkaas H, Sintnicolaas K, et al. External quality assessment of flow cytometric HLA-B27 typing. Cytometry. 2000;42:95-105.

Macardle PJ, McEvoy R, Jovanovich S. HLA-B27 expression by flow cytometry: An analysis of seven years quality assurance data. J Immunol Methods. 2000;243:51-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00227-1

Voorter CEM, Groeneveld L, Heidt S, Wieten L. Evaluation of 19 years of international external proficiency testing for high-resolution HLA typing. Front Genet. 2024;14:1290915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1290915

Harmer A, Mascaretti L, Petershofen E. Accreditation of histocompatibility and immunogenetics laboratories: Achievements and future prospects from the European Federation for Immunogenetics Accreditation Programme. HLA. 2018;92:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.13289

Lin G, Zhang K, Li J. A national proficiency scheme for human leucocyte antigen typing by next-generation sequencing. Clin Chim Acta. 2022;533:85-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.06.015

Duquesnoy RJ, Marrari M. Multilaboratory evaluation of serum analysis for HLA antibody and crossmatch reactivity by lymphocytotoxicity methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:149-56. https://doi.org/10.5858/2003-127-149-MEOSAF

Chong AS. Mechanisms of organ transplant injury mediated by B cells and antibodies: Implications for antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:23-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15844

Loupy A, Hill GS, Jordan SC. The impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies on late kidney allograft failure. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8:348-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.81

Tait BD, Süsal C, Gebel HM, Nickerson PW, Zachary AA, Claas FHJ, et al. Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95:19-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31827a19cc

Reinsmoen NL, Lai CH, Vo A, Cao K, Ong G, Naim M, et al. Acceptable donor-specific antibody levels allowing for successful deceased and living donor kidney transplantation after desensitization therapy. Transplantation. 2008;86:820-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181856f98

Cecka JM. Current methodologies for detecting sensitization to HLA antigens. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:398-403. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0b013e328348980a

Rodríguez-Ramírez S. Al Jurdi AD. Konvalinka AG. Riella L. Antibody-mediated rejection: Prevention, monitoring and treatment dilemmas. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2022;27:405-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001011

Tait BD, Hudson F, Brewin G, Cantwell L, Holdsworth R. Solid phase HLA antibody detection technology--challenges in interpretation. Tissue Antigens. 2010;76:87-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.2010.01486.x

Oh EJ, Park H, Park KU, Kang ES, Kim HS, Song EY. Interlaboratory comparison of the results of lifecodes LSA class I and class II single antigen kits for human leukocyte antigen antibody detection. Ann Lab Med. 2015;35:321-8. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2015.35.3.321

How to Cite
1.
español español, español E, Español E, Español E. Ten years of the immunogenetics laboratory performance assessment programme and its impact on the donor and transplant network. Biomed. [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 23 [cited 2025 Apr. 3];44(Sp. 2):155-67. Available from: https://revistabiomedicaorg.biteca.online/index.php/biomedica/article/view/7589

Some similar items:

Published
2024-12-23

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code