Reliability and reproducibility of the Fitzpatrick phototype scale for skin sensitivity to ultraviolet light

Guillermo Sánchez, John Nova, .

Keywords: reproducibility of results, dermatology, skin, skin pigmentation, skin neoplasm, solar radiation/adverse effects

Abstract

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Helvetica; panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536855809 -1073711037 9 0 511 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

Introduction. The Fitzpatrick phototype scale has been used to determine skin sensitivity to ultraviolet light. The reliability of this scale in estimating sensitivity permits risk evaluation of skin cancer based on phototype.

Objective. Reliability and changes in intra and inter-observer concordance was determined for the Fitzpatrick phototype scale after the assessment methods for establishing the phototype were standardized.

Materials and methods. An analytical study of intra and inter-observer concordance was performed. The Fitzpatrick phototype scale was standardized using focus group methodology. To determine intra and inter-observer agreement, the weighted kappa statistical method was applied. The standardization effect was measured using the equal kappa contrast hypothesis and Wald test for dependent measurements. The phototype scale was applied to 155 patients over 15 years of age who were assessed four times by two independent observers. The sample was drawn from patients of the Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta.

Results. During the pre-standardization phase, the baseline and six-week inter-observer weighted kappa were 0.31 and 0.40, respectively. The intra-observer kappa values for observers A and B were 0.47 and 0.51, respectively. After the standardization process, the baseline and six-week inter-observer weighted kappa values were 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. Intra-observer kappa coefficients for observers A and B were 0.78 and 0.82. Statistically significant differences were found between coefficients before and after standardization (p<0.001) in all comparisons.

Conclusion. Following a standardization exercise, the Fitzpatrick phototype scale yielded reliable, reproducible and consistent results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Guillermo Sánchez Oficina de Docencia e Investigación, Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
  • John Nova Oficina de Docencia e Investigación, Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

References

1. Fitzpatrick TB. Soleil et peau. J Med Esthet. 1975;2: 33-4.
2. Walter U, Kron M, Sander S, Sebastian G, Sander R, Peter RU, et al. Risk and protective factors for sporadic basal cell carcinoma: results of a two centre case control study in southern Germany. Clinical actinic elastosis may be a protective factor. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151:170-8.
3. Lear JT, Tan BB, Smith AG, Bowers W, Jones PW, Heagerty AH, et al. Risk factors for basal cell carci noma in the UK: case control study in 806 patients. J R Soc Med. 1997;90:371-4.
4. Loria D, Matos E. Risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: a case-control study in Argentina. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40:108-14.
5. Youn JI, Oh JK, Kim BK, Suh DH, Chung JH, Oh SJ, et al. Relationship between skin phototype and MED in Korean, brown skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1997;13:208-11.
6. Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A. Sample size tables for clinical studies. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1997.
7. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 104-27.
8. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage; 1998.
9. Walker D, Myrick F. Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:547-59. 10. Shaw VN. Research with participants in problem experience: challenge and strategies. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:841-54.
11. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257-68.
12. Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;29:111-23.
13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74 14. Barnhart H, Williamson J. Weighted least squares approach for comparing correlated kappa. Biometrics. 2002;58:1012-9.
15. Venkataram MN, Haitham AA. Correlating skin phototype and minimum erythema dose in Arab skin. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:191-2.
16. Stern RS, Momtaz K. Skin typing for assessment of skin cancer risk and acute response to UV-B and oral methoxalen photochemotherapy. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:869-73.
How to Cite
1.
Sánchez G, Nova J. Reliability and reproducibility of the Fitzpatrick phototype scale for skin sensitivity to ultraviolet light. Biomed. [Internet]. 2008 Dec. 1 [cited 2025 Apr. 7];28(4):544-50. Available from: https://revistabiomedicaorg.biteca.online/index.php/biomedica/article/view/59
Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code